It starts in childhood as the rational children try to interact with others but are unsuccessful because what comes to their mind to communicate or do for fun comes off as odd to other children since the sensors are always more prevalent in societies and do not easily accept what they perceive as an abnormality or significant difference in others.
The rationals may initially be depressed or morose about this; however, as they grow, and develop their personality more they are highly likely to conclude that the failure to connect with others is due to majority of children (sensors) being too stupid to interact with what the rational has to say and to do. This can turn into grandiosity, an unrealistic sense of superiority.
It isn't the case that sensors are less intelligent as commonly believed by rations. Sensors are very capably mentally. The key is that sensors and intuitives have different kinds of intelligence. One type of intelligence cannot be truly deemed the best. Anyone who says otherwise is looking at intelligence in a superficial way. On computers CPU , RAM, and memory storage are all very important. They are all useful and prudent for different tasks and different situations. The one aspect of a computer cannot be generalized to be worthless based off of one scenario. Large amounts of memory storage for example, will be useless to the common PC users, but suppose a business needs a computer to store records. Then, the memory storage is the most need aspect in that ONE SCENARIO, not all scenarios.
People relate to computers in this way. Each person has a unique type of intelligence. This allows for a diverse and prosperous society since every person has a role to fill that fits their natural strengths. Differences are not a valid reason to hate or think less of others. I enjoyed a world where more people understood this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandiosity
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Memory Connects to People's Outward Behaviors
My long term memory is not as good as my short term memory, not by a long shot. My long term memories don't completely go away, but I have a hard time remembering things at an identified time to remember them unless it is vital for me to remember. I forgot to bring an onion to make spicy chili because it required long term memory.
This is basically why I benefit greatly when I operate out of habit or routine.
I know that I don't lose the memories because as soon as I am reminded of them I remember them, but I basically am only focused on area of my memory at a time, I guess.
I observe that how a person's mind operates, will be outwardly manifested by their external actions and decisions, so a person does not need to speak to you in order for you to know how she thinks. Specific what I have observed, is how the people, of their own free will, choose to keep their room.
I'm an ISTJ with Si as my leading function. I know all my stuff is somewhere, but I don't know exactly where that stuff is off the top of my head. I have to search for it.
An INTJ has their room messy, but knows where everything is. The draw back is if the INTJ had his stuff moved around, he'll have a hard time finding anything, and will rip his hair out.
Artisans either have their room a complete mess and they lose stuff all the time or cannot find it, or they get tired of feeling cluttered so they dispose of as many belongings as they deem unnecessary. Artisans don't have the best memory's because they aren't good at holding onto information they don't use on a regular basis.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Ennegram, My life story, and how my Ne become very developed for an ISTJ
I don't believe the ennegram system is measuring born-with traits. I think it's describe how the born with personalities develop in different ways.
I, for example, can almost directly link the environment I was raised in and the events in my early life to having a lot of Ne development. An ENTP father that spoiled me and gave me a lot of attention, thus, he spent a lot of time with me, thus, there was a lot of time for him to rub off on me.
Then there's my mom who after around twenty years of marrriage to an ENTP and after raising five children before me; she was and is very Ne focused, so she raised me in a very Ne manner. A special blanket she made for me, had me watch a lot of different shows and movies as a kid, bought me a lot of toys and stuffed animals, took me to story time activities at the Sylan Oaks library, had me draw and do arts and crafts, and there are probably others.
Our family moved a lot so I learned how to be adaptive, and I experienced many differ cultures and people. I was born in New York and I learned their customs, as well as California customs. I moved 4 times in California alone, one time we lived in a camp ground for several weeks, and 3 recently, but that' not about my childhood development.
Oh, we can't forget all the video games that I played that had a lot of Ne put into making them. Nintendo games are very Ne flavorful.
Our family would go camping a lot, and every Saturday, or many Saturdays, my dad would find some place to take our family to go one a day trip and eat lunch or dinner out. We did a lot of activities on holidays, and Christmas was always magical for me. Every summer, our family would go on a week long vacation to some where special and do an activity that we normally would not such as going to Disney Land while staying at my sister's apartment, or doing to knot's berry farm and staying at a World Mark resort place in palm springs, a desert place with Joshua trees.
I was always helping with some project my dad was working on around the house doing assisting jobs such as holding nails or holding a flashlight.
I had to make a lot of new friends because they kept moving away.I had to adapt to a new school
There was always something going on that shook life up. It all affected my development as a person and has left me rather used to an eventful and changing life. I'm definitely much more extraverted intuition focused because of it.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Arrogance
Arrogance is commonly defined as : offensive display of superiority or self-importance; overbearing pride dictionary.com
I define it as: Believing one is correct without a thorough knowledge, or understanding.
In the Myers-Briggs system, an extrovert is someone who is externally focused while and introvert is someone who is internally focused. Both can be divided into two groups, Perceivers and Judgers.
Perceivers focus on external information and internal decision making. This means that they will put off drawing a conclusion until they have enough information to be certain that conclusion is correct, and then they are only going to make the conclusion relate to themselves or to one thing because they would need to acquire more information before they could draw the same conclusion about someone or something else.
Judgers are the opposite. They focus on internal information and external decision making. This means they will draw conclusions based off of information they already have and then later, if necessary, they will acquire more information.
How much perceivers put off conclusion, and how much judgers put off carefully acquiring information to make the right decision will depend on their level of arrogance.
If a perceiver is arrogant, they will believe they know what decision is the best for them to make at all times. This is why perceivers tend to be impulsive. If a perceiver is arrogant, they will believe they are aware of all the information that is presently available to them. Once a perceiver believes they have enough information, they will not hesitate to make decisions; thus, they impulsively act on the first thought that comes into their head.
If a judger is arrogant they will make decisions without considering new information. Judgers, can be known as people who are stubborn, inconsiderate, rash, and it all has to do with this. Quick judgements save time and energy, so it's very tempting to make them for judgers; however, one that is not arrogant will consider many different angles before reaching a single conclusion. The problem an arrogant judger will have, depends on their level of arrogance, : 1. Not considering new information at all when drawing conclusions, and 2. taking new information into consideration, but only acknowledging the information that reaffirms their judgements/conclusions.
A healthy, well rounded individual with avoid the pit-fall of arrogance. If you are a perceiver learn that even though the information may seem to clearly point to one course of action or conclusion, that you may be interpreting the information wrong. If you are a judger, learn that while the information you have seems to affirm your decision, you may be missing key bits of information that could alter your decision. All types are the risk of becoming arrogant, so all must be self aware and mindful.
I define it as: Believing one is correct without a thorough knowledge, or understanding.
In the Myers-Briggs system, an extrovert is someone who is externally focused while and introvert is someone who is internally focused. Both can be divided into two groups, Perceivers and Judgers.
Perceivers focus on external information and internal decision making. This means that they will put off drawing a conclusion until they have enough information to be certain that conclusion is correct, and then they are only going to make the conclusion relate to themselves or to one thing because they would need to acquire more information before they could draw the same conclusion about someone or something else.
Judgers are the opposite. They focus on internal information and external decision making. This means they will draw conclusions based off of information they already have and then later, if necessary, they will acquire more information.
How much perceivers put off conclusion, and how much judgers put off carefully acquiring information to make the right decision will depend on their level of arrogance.
If a perceiver is arrogant, they will believe they know what decision is the best for them to make at all times. This is why perceivers tend to be impulsive. If a perceiver is arrogant, they will believe they are aware of all the information that is presently available to them. Once a perceiver believes they have enough information, they will not hesitate to make decisions; thus, they impulsively act on the first thought that comes into their head.
If a judger is arrogant they will make decisions without considering new information. Judgers, can be known as people who are stubborn, inconsiderate, rash, and it all has to do with this. Quick judgements save time and energy, so it's very tempting to make them for judgers; however, one that is not arrogant will consider many different angles before reaching a single conclusion. The problem an arrogant judger will have, depends on their level of arrogance, : 1. Not considering new information at all when drawing conclusions, and 2. taking new information into consideration, but only acknowledging the information that reaffirms their judgements/conclusions.
A healthy, well rounded individual with avoid the pit-fall of arrogance. If you are a perceiver learn that even though the information may seem to clearly point to one course of action or conclusion, that you may be interpreting the information wrong. If you are a judger, learn that while the information you have seems to affirm your decision, you may be missing key bits of information that could alter your decision. All types are the risk of becoming arrogant, so all must be self aware and mindful.
Friday, March 1, 2013
ISTJ! ISTJ! ISTJ!
ISTJs that's me!
Introverted
Sensing
Thinking
Judging
Some things
-ISTJs will have the most approiate emotions while ESTPs with have the most appropriate reactions.
Our emotions are the most appropriate. What do I mean by that? Well, basically our functions go in the same order that the creation of emotions go in. Sensing, Thinking, Feeling. Emotions are terms reactions in objectivism. This means that they are the result of information we have received and analyzed which tells us how to respond. Si takes in information, Te processes, and Fi tells me what the information means for me. This is the reason why ISTJs are so dang practical, and resourceful. We can make good purchases because we take in the facts, think about them, and decide an items importance.
ESTPs will have the mos appropriate emotional reactions, or reactions in general sense emotions are the core basis for our decision when it all comes down to it. This is why ESTPs can be so smooth talking and good at scaring you. They see you before you see them, they are analyzing things quickly, and getting responses quickly. They are really good at disciplining children because they can talk the children into submission without ever having to be physically abusive. ISTJs just get forceful when disciplining. We can see the same things ESTPs see, usually, but we aren't good with words, or thinking on our feet so we use physical force. I have never harmed children, but I have quickly resorted to picking them up or physically preventing them from doing wrong.
-Everything sucks!
The world is a horrible place we see all the problems in it and none of the good things because those good things are good, so what's the point in acknowledging such; problems, however, are worth mention because something must be done about them.
More to come later.
Introverted
Sensing
Thinking
Judging
Some things
-ISTJs will have the most approiate emotions while ESTPs with have the most appropriate reactions.
Our emotions are the most appropriate. What do I mean by that? Well, basically our functions go in the same order that the creation of emotions go in. Sensing, Thinking, Feeling. Emotions are terms reactions in objectivism. This means that they are the result of information we have received and analyzed which tells us how to respond. Si takes in information, Te processes, and Fi tells me what the information means for me. This is the reason why ISTJs are so dang practical, and resourceful. We can make good purchases because we take in the facts, think about them, and decide an items importance.
ESTPs will have the mos appropriate emotional reactions, or reactions in general sense emotions are the core basis for our decision when it all comes down to it. This is why ESTPs can be so smooth talking and good at scaring you. They see you before you see them, they are analyzing things quickly, and getting responses quickly. They are really good at disciplining children because they can talk the children into submission without ever having to be physically abusive. ISTJs just get forceful when disciplining. We can see the same things ESTPs see, usually, but we aren't good with words, or thinking on our feet so we use physical force. I have never harmed children, but I have quickly resorted to picking them up or physically preventing them from doing wrong.
-Everything sucks!
The world is a horrible place we see all the problems in it and none of the good things because those good things are good, so what's the point in acknowledging such; problems, however, are worth mention because something must be done about them.
More to come later.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)